Review: The Hunger Games

[nessaniel]

The annual "Hunger Games" are about to begin in the dystopian society of Panem (North America after a really bad and shitty war) and young Katniss volunteers to save her sister from the fight to the death between 24 boys and girls from the twelve districts where only one can survive. Together with her friend Peeta she tries to struggle through the horrible fights and the arbritrariness of the mass media that stage the Hunger Games as a big reality tv event.



Let’s get two things straight before we begin:

1. I hate dystopian future visions like whoa. Like really really whoa.

2. I only went to see this movie because I had hoped to see the Avengers trailer in cinema on the big screen. They didn’t show it. Fuck this shit.

Right, so now that I can hear the HG-fandom weighing the right stones to kill me let’s start with the actual review. xD

The movie was great, hands down.

Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss (what is that name, plz, someone explain this to me…) did an amazing job: since this movie relies on a strong female character only they needed someone who wouldn’t falter under that much pressure and not only did Lawrence that she also presented a strong, independent woman who was ACTUALLY NICE TO PEOPLE OH MY GOD. Normally, the heroic female requires either the help of a man in the very end or she is a bitch that no one in real life would like to become friends with: Katniss is likeable all around: she has a very hard life, she faces death and a deteriorated society almost devoid of normal human emotions and still manages to smile and joke and be mostly positive about her situation, her friends and family. Oh my God, I love her although I have to admit that I actually didn’t like Lawrence that much as Mystique in X-Men: First Class but now that she finally got a role to show her potential (and not be an annoyance to the epic gay love of Charles Xavier and Erik Lehnsherr ;D) she totally won me over with her very physical, strong and relatable performance. Beautiful, beautiful woman, I bow to you. <333

The other actors were… hmm, okay, I think. Since the focus lay on Katniss only, the other roles were mostly stereotyped versions of already-well-known character types: the mentor that cleans himself up because he sees the spark in his new student, the one-with-the-brainz, the Pinkie Pie, the loyal friend-zoned friend, the pure, innocent little sister, yaddah, yaddah. But still everyone did a good job – and I really, really really don’t see get how a part of the fandom of this book/movie could freak out over the fact that Rue, another tribute, a 12year old girl, was played by a POC-actress and not by a white one as she apparently was in the books? Come on, people! *scowling face of hatred*

Peeta was really a sweet damsel in distress all the time and the switch of gender roles was perfect: one doesn’t doubt Katniss’ strength but neither did one question Peeta’s devotion to her and it didn’t matter which sex they belonged to. The one and only time this was even brought up was during the aftermath of Peeta’s public declaration of love towards Katniss:
After the tv-show Katniss punches him and tells that this confession will make her look weak but the mentor argues that it will make her desirable which she needs to be in order to attract sponsors. This is a very clever move I daresay: making “being desirable” a part of the tv-land’s lies and oppressing system sends a very good or at least a very different message to young girls.

The camera work was fantastic, the actors were great and the characters very relatable, they created a thrilling atmosphere and I was on the edge of my seat for a good third of the movie.

One of this movie’s biggest challenges, I could imagine, was to show the death of children in a not-too-gory way and they outdid themselves with that: quick shots, a bloody knife here and there, not enough to actually see something but one could feel the threatening atmosphere and the imminent lethal danger everywhere which just underlined how great the camera techniques were executed. Breathtaking, I tell ya!

Mind you, I didn’t know anything about the books or the story until the movie but even I could follow the plot and different conflicts without any trouble (which is not always the case, right, Harry Potter 3?!??! Sorry, I’m still not over the whole Marauder-denying part of that movie).

So yeah, overall the movie was awesome and apart from some really cheap and badly looking CGI effects (that fire looked more real in LotR – and that movie is fucking 10 years old OMFG!!!) I have nothing to say against it.

Although I’m still wondering how the fuck they managed to get a FSK-12 (PG13) rating for this one no matter the not-so-bloody—but-still-horrible-deaths. There was still a great deal of trauma potential in there: casually snapped necks, the murders of young children getting played for laughs, a twelve year old impaled with a spear, how the everloving fuck did that get past the censors??! I mean they did censor the whole endfight of “The Hulk” from 2008 where two green CGI monsters threw cars at each other into a two second long sequence of boringness! But children dying in a totalitarian regime’s gladiator games that’s played for fun? Sure why not! Jesus Christ, we aren’t that far away ourselves from the Hunger Games I fear. *shakes head over the ignorant greedy schemes of movie marketing companies*

Oh and another point but that’s not the movie’s fault: my hate for dystopian topics derives from the simple fact that they are always the same. Always.

A great big war or other catastrophe sparks a horrible change in society? Check.

A method of oppression is used by the government to make the public hopeless and easier to control? Check. (Here it was famine and starvation, in V for Vendetta and 1984 is was 24/7 surveillance, in Brave New World it was hypnosis and “happy pills” and a caste system and the list could go on forever).

A society devoid of any empathy at all? Check and double check since some of the tributes themselves were nutcases with a desire to kill.

A certain person is somehow dropped from the perfect system and starts to question it? Check although I have to give the movie kudos since Katniss is not that special at all: granted, she can hunt and take care of herself but theoretically speaking all the other tributes had the same chance to become like this too. (Take “Equilibrium” for example where Christian Bale’s character only starts to question the system because of his undying love for Sean Bean he tries to find out why his partner was so fascinated by books or heck, take “Napola” where the one guy to act against the Nazis’s devilries is the one boy that looks thin, sickly and has black hair in a group of sturdy, blond blocks).

So yeah: that’s not the movie’s or the book’s fault at all, it’s just not my genre of film/literature at all and although I can appreciate the love for details or how well crafted the movie was it certainly won’t become one of my favorites. I really just wanted to justify myself, btw (A-levels in English class were a pain in the ass during that special topic. God, I hate you, dystopia.)

Comments

[nessaniel.livejournal.com]

Wie würdest du eine dystopian world sonst aufziehen?^^
Gar nicht, ich würde Kuchen backen. xD

Damit es hier nicht so aussieht, als würde ich meiner besseren Hälfte NIE antworten, weil wir immer alles im Wohnzimmer auf dem Sofa ausdiskutieren hier eine laaaaaaaaaaaaange Antwort, die du nicht zu lesen brauchst, weil wir eh schon alles im Wohnzimmer auf dem Sofa ausdiskutiert haben (und klingt das irgendwie sexuell oder ist das das tumblr-Syndrom = UST everywhere?).

Dystopia muss ja auch irgendwie als das Gegenteil von Utopia sowie als Spiegel einer tatsächlich existierenden Gesellschaft funktionieren und da bleibt relativ wenig Spielraum.
Gibt es überhaupt utopische Welten, die ähnlich wie Dystopien so wahnsinnig beliebt sind in den Medien? (Apart from Cartooney-Land where you can obviously outbuy a whole company without having to touch their stock ever...xD)
Das Problem hier ist ja eigentlich nur mein ganz persönlicher, ganz subjektiver Geschmack, der mir da sagt, dass ich Dystopien langweilig finde, eben weil mir die Merkmale des Genres immer und immer und immer wieder ins Auge fallen und ich bisher noch keine Version gesehen habe, in der z.B. viel mit anderen Charakteren interagiert wurde, die nicht zum System gehören oder die nicht einen ähnlichen Wandel erleben wie der Protagonist.

Würden sie in unserer Gesellschaft beispelsweise auffallen? Oder sind sie vielmehr mit Eigenschaften geschückt, die sich möglicherweise sehr leicht auf den Leser übertragen lassen?
Ich glaub, ich kapier nicht ganz, was du damit meinst, denn die Charaktere in den Werken, die ich kenne, suchen die Auseinandersetzung nicht unbedingt freiwillig. "Equilibrium" zum Beispiel: Bale erschießt seinen langjährigen Partner für den er eindeutig schwul ist, omg, so ghey <333, weil dieser das Gesetz gebrochen und ein Buch gelesen hat und Bales eigene Frau hat ebenfalls Hochverrat begangen: die beiden Events zusammen sind sozusagen der Auslöser dafür, dass er Fragen stellt und alle über den Haufen schießt. Oder in Brave New World, wo Bernard Marx einem Fabrikationsfehler unterliegt und deshalb zu klein geraten ist, um in seiner Alpha-Kaste nicht aufzufallen. In Fahrenheit 451 widerrum trifft Montag auf einen Freigeist (Claire? Cassie? Irgendwie so heißt die xD) und befreit sich mit dessen Hilfe aus seinem konformen Denken bzw. dann später durch das zufällige Lesen eines Buches. Die Story von C. wird aber zum Beispiel nicht genau erklärt, also, warum sie so freidenkerisch geworden ist, wobei das natürlich mal interessant gewesen wäre (zugegeben, in Fahrenheit ist das totalitäre Regime auch nicht sooo ausgeprägt und obwohl man nicht "selbstständig denken" soll, um nicht asozial zu werden gibts keine Gedankenkontrolle und Co. in dieser Welt, Cassie oder wie auch immer kann also durchaus von allein drauf gekommen sein, aber interessiert hätte es mich schon XD). Für mich sieht es eher so aus, als sei das "Anderssein des Protagonisten" eine Art Genredefinition oder ein Merkmal dieser Literaturschiene. Aber wie ich oben gesagt habe, in Hunger Games ist Katniss schließlich einfach nur das nette, wenn auch wahnsinnig hungrige Mädchen von nebenan, die ihr Geschwisterkind liebt und es verteidigen will - Gale anscheinend hat seine Brüder ja auch lieb (especially his big brother omg *3* XDDD) und von daher ist Katniss jetzt nicht wahnsinnig besonders oder speziell. Kudos to you movie! <3

Eh ja. Der Rest ist eine Sofadiskussion gewesen. XD